Ãå±±½ûµØ

UNDT/2022/039

UNDT/2022/039, Iram

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The investigation successfully established that the Applicant engaged in workplace harassment in seven different occasions against the three complainants. By committing workplace harassment, the Applicant breached the highest standards of integrity and engaged in behaviour unbecoming of an international civil servant. As such, her conduct constitutes serious misconduct. However, the disciplinary measure of separation from service imposed on the Applicant was found to be too harsh of a penalty lin light of the Administration’s past disciplinary measures on other cases of comparable conduct, as well as the context in the backdrop of the decision. Thus, the Applicant’s right to have a sanction proportionate to the misconduct was found to have been violated. As a result, the Tribunal decided to rescind the disciplinary measure of separation from service with compensation in lieu of notice and with termination indemnity, replacing it by that of demotion of one step in grade with deferment, for three years, of eligibility for consideration for promotion. Should the Respondent elect to pay compensation in lieu of reinstatement, the Applicant shall be paid a sum of 12 months of her net-base salary at the rate she would have been paid had she been demoted at the time of her separation.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant is contesting the disciplinary measure of separation from service with compensation in lieu of notice and with termination indemnity, in accordance with Ãå±±½ûµØStaff Rule 10.2(a)(viii).

Legal Principle(s)

 

Outcome
Judgment entered for Applicant in full or in part
Outcome Extra Text

 

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.