Ãå±±½ûµØ

UNDT/2022/070

UNDT/2022/070, Njagi

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Applicant contested the imposition of disciplinary and non-disciplinary measures following the completion of a disciplinary process thus, she was not required to request management evaluation as per staff rule 11.2(b). In accordance with art. 8.1(d)(ii), her application should have been submitted directly to the UNDT within 90 calendar days of her receipt of the administrative decision. The Applicant received the sanction letter/contested decision on 1 April 2022, which meant that she had to file her UNDT application on or before 30 June 2022 to be within the prescribed time limits. She did not, however, file an incomplete application until 7 July 2022 and a complete application until 24 July 2022, which was outside the timeframe stipulated by the UNDT Statute. The application was therefore deemed to be time-barred.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The disciplinary measure of demotion with deferment, for a period of three years, of eligibility for consideration for promotion in accordance with staff rule 10.2(a)(vii) and administrative measures consisting of training concerning the procurement process and the use of Umoja. Further, the USG/DMSPC authorized the recovery of KES429,800 through deductions from the Applicant’s salary, in accordance with staff rule 10.2(b).

Legal Principle(s)

Article 8.1(d)(ii) of the UNDT Statute stipulates that in cases where management evaluation of the contested decision is not required, an application shall be receivable if an application is filed within 90 calendar days of the applicant’s receipt of the administrative decision.

Outcome
Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Njagi
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type