UNDT/2023/030

UNDT/2023/030, Alphonso

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The issue was whether the Applicant was entitled to education grant for his son’s last year of a five-year degree program which includes two semesters (approximately one year) of no cost/no tuition co-operatives/internships.

The Tribunal held that since the Applicant's son was enrolled in his educational institution during years three and four of his programme, during which the co-op semesters were part of the curriculum, there was no basis not to count years three and four as school years. As these years entailed less expenses on account of tuition not being paid during the co-op semesters, the Applicant’s education grant for these years was adjusted accordingly. To use “savings” made in years three and four to pay for the fifth year of education would contradict staff regulation 3.2(a). The Tribunal found that the impugned decision conformed with the legislative framework.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The decision by the Kuwait Joint Support Office (“KJSO”) to reject the Applicant's request for an education grant advance for the 2022/2023 school year.

Legal Principle(s)

The governing principles, which are expressed consistently in the legislative hierarchy for the education grant entitlement, are: periods eligible for education grant are counted by school years, and not by their equivalent in the duration of the education; and as far as tuition is concerned, the grant is based on reimbursement of the expenses actually incurred and does not operate as a lumpsum.

Outcome
Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Alphonso
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type