The UNAT interpreted the application as a request for a correction of the previous UNAT judgment.
The UNAT noted that the case file of the former United Nations Administrative Tribunal revealed that the President of that Tribunal had extended the deadline for filing the appeal but a copy of that decision had not been placed in the file submitted to the UNAT. The UNAT observed that it had rendered its judgment to reject the appeal, without being aware of the President's decision.
The UNAT found, however, that the staff member's appeal was received by the United Nations Administrative Tribunal...