Burden of proof
Disciplinary matters / misconduct
Disciplinary measure or sanction
Dismissal/separation
Discrimination and other improper motives
Due process
Legal services (OSLA or other) and self-representation
Legal representation
UNAT held that UNDT did not err and that clear and convincing evidence established that the Appellant participated in an attempted taking of property belonging to the Organisation. UNAT held that UNDT did not err in concluding that the disciplinary sanction of dismissal from service was proportionate and lawful. On the Appellant’s claim that the items were “garbage”, UNAT held that this claim was entirely without merit as the evidence showed that the items included over USD 5,000 worth of material, including boxes of new floor tiles. On the Appellant’s claim that UNDT failed to fully assess...