Ãå±±½ûµØ

2011-UNAT-139

2011-UNAT-139, Basenko

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNAT recalled that access to the new system of administration of justice can be extended to persons who are not formally staff members but who can legitimately be entitled to rights similar to those of a staff member. UNAT held that this exception must be understood in a restrictive sense. UNAT held that interns have no access to the new system of administration of justice. UNAT dismissed the appeal.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

A former intern with the Division of Management of the United Nations Office at Vienna contested the decision to withdraw the offer of a new internship with the International Trade Law Division. UNDT found that she was neither a current nor a former staff member of the Ãå±±½ûµØand that, pursuant to the provisions of Article 3.1 of its Statute, it was not competent to hear her application.

Legal Principle(s)

Interns have no standing before UNDT or UNAT as they are neither current nor former staff members of the United Nations.

Outcome
Appeal dismissed on receivability

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Basenko
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type