UNDT/2009/095, Sefraoui
Outcome: Application dismissed as the preponderance of evidence demonstrated that the applicant’s candidature had been given full and fair consideration.
Despite having many years of experience as an Arabic translator, the applicant was not short-listed for two P-4 positions as a reviser. The applicant contended that the selection process had been flawed by several shortcomings.
Under a staff member’s employment contract, in any case of appointment or promotion the Secretary-General must comply with all the statutory instruments (Ãå±±½ûµØCharter, regulations, rules, administrative issuances, etc) and established practices. The persons evaluating a candidate’s qualifications must do so rationally and fairly in the sense and to the extent necessary to reasonably assess his claims as against others competing with him, taking into account and appropriately weighing up all relevant matters free of any bias and irrelevant considerations and based upon accurate information in so far as it could be reasonably ascertained. Cases should be determined by the preponderance of evidence rather than by imposing an a priori burden of proof on the staff member. If the evidence is evenly balanced, the impugned administrative decision should be regarded as unjustified since the Administration has the contractual obligation of making decisions for reasons that are accurate, sufficient and proper.