UNDT/2010/023, Lesar
In cases deemed suitable to be decided by summary judgment, usually an oral hearing is not necessary. In non-disciplinary cases, it is a matter of judicial discretion to hold an oral hearing or to abstain from it. The mandate of UNDT is confined to the review of administrative decisions. Although the definition of this term may be disputed, it is beyond question that administrative decisions must by essence be taken by the Administration. Since the decisions of former UNAT are judicial decisions, they cannot be contested before UNDT. The provisions on transitional measures apply to pending UNAT cases only. Cases closed by judgments of former UNAT are res iudicata.
The Applicant filed an application with former UNAT in 2006. On 31 July 2009, former UNAT issued a judgement rejecting his application in its entirety. On 6 November 2009, his counsel discovered a memorandum in the Applicant’s OSF which he considered illegal. On 30 November 2009, the Applicant filed an application with UNDT, alleging that the judgement of former UNAT would have been different if the existence of the memorandum had been known. He also requested an oral hearing.
N/A