UNDT/2011/026

UNDT/2011/026, Majbri

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

Having examined the documents and having heard the evidence from the PCO of the selection panel, the Tribunal is satisfied that there was no material irregularity in that all relevant procedures and guidelines were followed. The JAB panel’s examination of the facts is not tainted by procedural error or bias. The application before this Tribunal fails and is dismissed.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant challenged his non-selection for a post.

Legal Principle(s)

The panel’s task was to review the process and to determine if the relevant procedures appeared to have been complied with, that there was evidence that the Applicant’s candidacy was given due consideration and that the result appears to have been free from extraneous considerations and bias or prejudice.

Outcome

Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/Appellants

Majbri

Entity

DGACM

Case Number(s)

UNDT/NY/2010/024/AT/1648

Tribunal

UNDT

Registry

New York