�山����

On 31 January, 1 and 8 December 2010, the Applicant, a former staff member of UNODC, wrote to the Administration, claiming that he was the victim of harassment and abuse of authority. The Administration responded in March 2011, asking him to resubmit his allegations in accordance with section 5.13 of ST/SGB/2008/5. Before the Tribunal, the Applicant challenges the decision not to take action in response to his reports of prohibited conduct. The Tribunal finds that, irrespective of whether or not the allegations made by the Applicant constituted “formal reports” of prohibited conduct within the meaning of ST/SGB/2008/5, the Administration had a duty to take “prompt and concrete action” in response to these allegations. It further considers that the Administration’s delay in responding to the Applicant is unreasonable and warrants compensation. However, the Tribunal also finds that, in the form in which they were submitted, the Applicant’s allegations did not provide sufficient grounds to warrant a formal fact-finding investigation.