Ãå±±½ûµØ

UNDT/2013/009

UNDT/2013/009, Diabagate

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

All the unresolved questions, the established facts and the Applicant’s failure to bring evidence in order to convince the Tribunal of the alleged extortion scheme against him support an inference that the Applicant had likely engaged in a sexual relationship with V01, a minor. Given all the surrounding circumstances of the charge, investigations and his own actions and explanations, the Applicant has not sufficiently discharged the burden upon him. The wording in paragraphs 3.2 (a) and (b) of ST/SGB/2003/13 is clear. Sexual exploitation and sexual abuse constitute acts of serious misconduct and are therefore grounds for disciplinary measures including summary dismissal. Mistaken belief in the age of a child is not a defence. The Tribunal, having found that there is a preponderance of evidence that the Applicant engaged in sexual activity with V01 who was at the time under the age of 18 years, holds that the disciplinary measure of summary dismissal that was imposed on the Applicant was proportionate to the offence.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

On 6 October 2010 the Applicant was summarily dismissed from service for serious misconduct. On 17 January 2011, he filed an Application challenging the decision.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.