UNDT/2013/016, Malor
The Applicant considers that the disclosure requirements did not apply to him. The Respondent failed to establish that the Applicant was required to file a financial disclosure statement for 2006. The Tribunal rescinds the Applicant’s written reprimand. Any record of it is to be removed from the Applicant’s Official Status File.
The Applicant contests the decision made by OHRM to impose on him the sanction of a written reprimand, and include it in his official status file (“OSF”) following his failure to file a financial disclosure statement for 2006 within the imparted deadlines.
ST/SGB/2006/6 identifies two separate groups of staff members that are required to file a yearly financial disclosure: staff members at the D-1 or L-6 level (sec. 2.1(a)); and staff members identified by “[t]he relevant head of department or office” (sec. 2.2). The Respondent did not meet the required burden of proof as he was unable to produce the 2006 list that was provided to the Ethics Office identifying the Applicant as being a staff member required to file a financial disclosure statement for 2006.