Ãå±±½ûµØ

UNDT/2013/142

UNDT/2013/142, Charles

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Applicant alleged that the selection exercise was procedurally flawed and biased against him. The UNDT found that the candidates’ answers on the written tests were marked by an assessor who did not know the identities of the candidates. The UNDT found that the Applicant was not prejudiced by the manner in which the test was carried out. The UNDT found the Applicant’s claims unsubstantiated and dismissed the application.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant, a staff member of the Procurement Division of the Department of Management in New York, contested his non-selection for a P-4 level Procurement Officer position in the United Nations Office at Nairobi.

Legal Principle(s)

Allegation of unlawfulness: Suspicion alone, without any rational basis, is not enough to substantiate an allegation of unlawfulness. Delay in receiving management evaluation: Article 8.1(d) of the Tribunal’s Statute as well as staff rule 11.4(a) state that an applicant may file an appeal before the Dispute Tribunal if he or she has not received a response to his request for management evaluation within the applicable response period.

Outcome
Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Charles
Entity
DM
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry
Date of Judgement
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type