UNDT/2016/122

UNDT/2016/122, Nielsen

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Dispute Tribunal rejected the application as irreceivable ratione materiae and ratione temporis, on the grounds that the applicant did not submit a request for management evaluation of the contested decision within the applicable deadline, and that the application was filed more than three years after receipt of the contested decision. Identification of the contested decision: As the Appeals Tribunal held in Massabni 2012-UNAT-238, it is part of the duties and of the inherent powers of a Judge to adequately interpret and comprehend the applications submitted by the parties, and to “identify what is in fact being contested”. In practice, this is all the more important when the Applicant is self-represented and not legally trained. Time limit to submit an application to the Dispute Tribunal: Pursuant to art. 8.4 of the Dispute Tribunal’s Statute, an application is irreceivable ratione temporis when it is filed more than three years after receipt of the contested decision. Abuse of process: A repeated failure to observe the minimal requirements for filing an application may lead the Tribunal to award costs against an applicant to prevent an abuse of proceedings.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant challenged the decision of the Office of Audit and Investigations (“OAI”), UNDP, not to initiate an investigation into her complaint of harassment against a former colleague.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.