UNDT/2020/060

UNDT/2020/060, Cherneva

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal reviewed the present application and found that it was not receivable ratione temporis and ratione personae. In accordance with art. 8.4 of the Tribunal’s Statute and art. 7.6 of its Rules of Procedure, an application shall not be receivable if it is filed more than three years after the applicant’s receipt of the contested administrative decision. The Applicant clearly indicated in her application that the contested decision dated back to 2010 and, in such circumstances, her application was not receivable ratione temporis. Furthermore, the Tribunal observed that while the Applicant indicated in her application that she was a staff member of the Organization, she contested, in fact, a decision related to her status as a Consultant. However, pursuant to articles 2.1 and 3.1 of the Tribunal’s Statute, the status of a staff member is a necessary condition for access to the Tribunal. The Tribunal therefore found that the Applicant had no standing to contest the alleged decision and that her application must also be denied on the grounds that it was not receivable ratione personae pursuant to art. 3.1 of the Tribunal’s Statute.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant contested a decision concerning the payment of her work as a Consultant in the United Nations Environment Programme (“UNEP”) in 2010.

Legal Principle(s)

The Tribunal has, on several occasions, considered matters of receivability on a priority basis without first transmitting a copy of the application to the Respondent or awaiting the Respondent’s reply before taking action to consider the claim (Hunter UNDT/2012/036, Milich UNDT/2013/007, Masylkanova UNDT/2013/033, Kalpokas Tari UNDT/2013/180, Karambizi UNDT/2018/001, Madi UNDT/2018/006, Nwogu UNDT/2018/041 and Morales UNDT/2019/158). The UNDT is competent to review its own competence or jurisdiction in accordance with Article 2(6) of its Statute when determining the receivability of an application (Christensen 2013-UNAT-335).

Outcome
Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.