Ãå±±½ûµØ

Receivability of claim for relief: In his application before the former Ãå±±½ûµØAdministrative Tribunal, the Applicant merely requested compensation for the prejudice suffered. His request that the contested decision be rescinded, which was submitted two years later, must be rejected as time-barred since it was submitted long after the time limit for appeal had expired. 30 v. 60-day mark candidates: Section 6.2 of ST/AI/2002/4 prescribes that applications from 30-day mark candidates received after the 30-day mark shall be considered at the 60-day mark. Furthermore, it is clear from the provisions of ST/AI/2002/4—in particular sections 4.5 and 7.1, as well as paragraph 4 of annex III—that applications of candidates eligible to be considered at the 30-day mark and who applied before the 30-day mark must be considered before those of candidates eligible to be considered at the 60-day mark. 60-day mark candidates may only be considered if there are no qualified 30-day mark candidates. Compensation: In setting the appropriate amount of compensation, the Tribunal must assess the chance that the Applicant would have been promoted had the correct procedure been followed. In the present case, the Applicant had a limited chance of being promoted, but a fair chance of being recommended and thus placed on the roster.