Ãå±±½ûµØ

UNDT/2014/015

UNDT/2014/015, Nzokirishaka

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal concluded that the facts on which the sanction was based were established, that the established facts constituted misconduct and that the sanction was proportionate to the offence. Hearings in disciplinary matters: The Tribunal held that it is the duty of the Judge to decide whether the nature of the case is such that a hearing may be dispensed with. The Judge should consider the following factors: (i) the issues raised and their complexity; (ii) the availability and relevance of witnesses; (iii) the stand of the Applicant and that of Respondent; and (iv) the legal issues involved. Authorization by the Secretary-General: The Tribunal held that a staff member who has been granted authorization for outside activities/employment by the Secretary-General does not have a free license. He/she must be careful not to put him/herself in a situation of conflict. If the staff member is found to be in a situation of conflict notwithstanding the authorization of the Secretary-General, the latter would be at liberty to revoke the authorization and even start disciplinary action against that staff member.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision of the USG/DM to separate him from service for working as a Deputy Prosecutor for the Burundian Ministry of Justice while employed as a BINUB staff member (outside activities).

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.