�山����

Plain meaning rule. The Appeals Tribunal has confirmed and defined the application of the plain meaning rule in several judgments.Ubi lex non distinguit, nec nos distinguere debemus. According to the general legal principle of interpretation, ubi lex non distinguit, nec nos distinguere debemus, i.e., where the law does not distinguish, neither should we distinguish, the interpreter of the law cannot distinguish where the law does not distinguish and cannot create and/or add an exception(s) to an established rule with a general applicability and thereby limit its area of application.Interpretation of staff rule 4.16(b). Strictly applicable to: (a) the appointment to P-1 and P-2 level posts that are subject to the system of desirable ranges at the United Nations Secretariat; and (b) the appointment to all posts requiring special language competence in the United Nations Secretariat. From a plain reading of staff rule 4.16(b)(i) it results that the provision does not include any exceptions and does not distinguish between the posts requiring language skills in the GS and the P-levels. Therefore, staff rule 4.16 is generally applicable to all appointments to posts requiring special language competence within the �山����Secretariat. Pursuant to staff rule 4.14(b), a staff member in the language services needs to satisfy the following mandatory and cumulative conditions to be granted a continuing appointment: (a) the staff member in the �山����Secretariat must be recruited upon successful completion of a competitive examination pursuant to staff rule 4.16; (b) the staff member must complete two years on a fixed-term appointment; (c) the staff member’s service must have been satisfactory.Compensation and art. 10.5(b) of the Statute. Art. 10.5(b) of the Dispute Tribunal’s Statute was amended by the General Assembly in December 2014 and that the text introduced, as a mandatory new requirement, that the Dispute Tribunal may only award compensation “for harm, supported by evidence”. This requirement is both substantive, because the compensation can only be awarded for harm, and procedural, because the harm must be supported by evidence. Breach of a fundamental nature can give rise to an award of moral damages only if the harm to the staff member is supported by evidence.