�山����

The Tribunal considered that despite the Applicant’s characterization of the contested decision as a “written reprimand” in his request for management evaluation and in his application, there was never a reprimand issued by an authorized official and, thus, there was no administrative decision to contest. The Tribunal, therefore, found that the application was not receivable ratione materiae. The Tribunal also noted that since the record related to the investigation of a complaint made against the Applicant was deleted from the Misconduct Tracking System (“MTS”), the Applicant’s claim in this respect became moot. The Tribunal further notes that the factual background provided in its decision did not reveal any material or information concerning the Applicant requiring protection. Consequently, the Tribunal found no grounds warranting anonymization and rejected the Applicant’s motion in this regard.