Receivability Contested decisions Considering the Applicants’ submissions as a whole, the contested decisions are to be identified as Secretary-General’s decisions, in implementing the Unified Salary Scale, to convert a portion of the Applicants’ salaries into a separate allowance. The Applicants do not challenge the General Assembly’s resolution adopting the Unified Salary Scale as a measure of general application. Whether the contested decisions constitute administrative decisions In interpreting its jurisdiction, the Tribunal must take into account the Organization’s duty to provide access...
Rule 3.3(a)
Showing 1 - 2 of 2
Administrative decision
Definition
TEST -Rename- Benefits and entitlements-45
Dependency benefits
Jurisdiction / receivability (UNDT or first instance)
Subject matter (ratione materiae)
Salary
Salary scales
Disciplinary matters / misconduct
Disciplinary measure or sanction
Facts (establishment of) / evidence
Failure to report misconduct
Non-disciplinary/administrative measures
Regarding the question of whether material facts were sufficiently established, the Tribunal concluded that they were sufficiently established except the allegations that the Applicant instructed other staff members to provide false information. The parties disputed whether the Applicant was a supervisor as charged. The Applicant did not fall under the category of “supervisor “ as per the UNON Security and Safety Service (UNON/SSS) SOP No 13. Undisputedly though, the Applicant carried out team leader functions and the UNON/SSS Daily Orders which assigned the Applicant to provide “security...