The Tribunal found that the Applicant had performance shortcomings as evidenced by the 2016 to 2019 ePADs and by the fact that he failed to initiate the 2020 ePAD.
The Applicant was aware or could reasonably be expected to have been aware of the required performance standards.
The Applicant was given a fair opportunity to meet the required standard and the Administration did not err by not availing him more opportunities to improve considering the totality of circumstances in this case.
The totality of circumstances supported a finding that the termination of the Applicant's appointment was...